Job news

I cannot remember a period as busy as the one from which I have just emerged.  Over the last four weeks I have been inspired by the ADE Institute orientation in Bali, been bowled over by the temples in Siem Reap, and flown 14000 miles attending an interview in England.  The ADE Institute was, as I have said before, amazing.  Now I am thinking about a related project that I need to complete by 23^rd May so that is very much on my mind.  Siem Reap was eye-opening, and truly a slice of ‘proper’, authentic Asia.  Very impressive temples and I am so pleased that we were able to take our children to see the likes of Angkor Watt.  The interview – well, the flight over to England was stunningly complicated and exhausting, beginning with a cancelled flight from Brisbane to Abu Dhabi, and result in stopovers in Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain and 48 HOURS after departure, eventually London Heathrow.  Wired on coffee and doubly jet-lagged, I somehow made it through both days of a very challenging SLT interview, and the great news for me is that I now have a new job to look forward to in August.  Such a relief for all of us.  

ADE Institute Bali 2013

The last few days have been shrouded in secrecy.  The reason for this is that I have been attending my first Apple Distinguished Educator conference in Bali, and it was the single most valuable professional development I have ever attended.  The reason for the secrecy is in fact because there were over 300 educators in attendance for five days, each carrying an average of three Apple devices, and security was tight.   In addition there have been a few announcements that we still need to stay tight-lipped about – none of which are trade secrets but they will involve further announcements to other ADEs around the world.  

I have come away from this with many things, including an incredible amount of insightful comments about a wide range of topics, and a profound sense of community amongst fellow ADEs.  Many topics discussed had very little to do with Apple products themselves, such as Challenge-Based Learning, the SAMR model, TPack and flipping the classroom.  The conversations I had will have  many direct consequences on our recent 1:1 iPad trial with students and many teachers, and for that alone I am grateful.  It truly did open my eyes to the notion that there are thousands of other teachers in the world who are also pushing boundaries and coming up with new models of assessment and teaching and learning and ways of integrating technology into the classroom.  Inspirational stuff.

Ed(mo(o)d(le)o

Nine years ago I was asked to looking into some upcoming new software platform called a VLE for Tanglin.  We looked at a few different solutions at the time, including Blackboard and Sharepoint.  Then we came across the open-source delight of moodle.  Thus was born a relationship with moodle that has continued for me right up to this day.  When I joined Oathall in 2006 it was the VLE of choice for West Sussex, and in fact I delivered some county training on moodle to interested teachers.  Coincidentally it was also the VLE when I joined GIS, and we are still using it.  And I still think it has a place.


But oh dear I have just come across edmodo (late to the party on this I know) and it is just so....simple....slick....easy.  None of these words can be applied to moodle - which is like the bigger stronger, more boring and plainer brother to ed.  So I am feeling the same sort of pang that I felt when I crossed over to the other side from my HTC smartphone to an iPhone 4S - almost an existential IT geek anxst because I have found something that does similar things but just does them better than the old way.
Sigh.  For the record, moodle, you are very, er, useful.  In many ways.  But for my new iPad launch with a bunch of hoppingly excited Year 7s, I am using the Facebook-esque patina of edmodo, and the edmodo app is installed and gleaming with anticipation and ready to go.  And they cannot wait.

IT skills and employment

An article on the BBC caught my interest today, in which Will.i.am discusses how he is taking coding classes in order to learn more about the mysterious world of computing.  This is on the back of a research project by the Prince's Trust, which revealed that one in ten British youths are unable to fill in an online cv, while a quarter face the prospect of doing so with dread.  17% of the respondents stated that they simply did not apply for jobs that required even the most basic of computer skills.  What I do like from this is the response from the Prince's Trust - staff from the Science Museum will visit Prince's Trust clubs in schools to try to re-engage students who are at risk - or already are - underachieving.  Also catching my eye was a comment from Valerie Thompson of the E-learning Foundation, who noted that the pupil premium funds could be utilized in order to give disadvantaged student increased access to computers.  The incredible thing here is that this generation of youths are the ones who teachers tend to dub as the 'wired' generation, with an intuitive feel for technology.  Clearly this is not the case.  Clearly we are back in the territory of the digital divide.  And clearly we need to do something about this.

Computer pre-history

The Romans came late to seafaring.  Having vanquished all of the land mass of Italy with ease, the Romans happened upon  a stricken Carthagian quinquireme near Sicily.  This provided a template for Roman vessels to create a huge naval force, and after winning an epic sea battle against the Carthaginians tin 260BC, the Roman dominance of the Mediterranean Sea eventually led to it being referred to as a Roman lake. 

One such vessel was skirting the treacherous waters south of the Peloponnese in 70BC.  Its hold was swollen with antiquities, curios and innumerable treasures of golden artifacts - all condemned to centuries beneath the waves as the ship dashed against the rocks of Antikythera.

Yet this ship, and this priceless treasure, hid a secret that lay hidden for thousands of years after the wreckage.  The secret was a device of stunning complexity, of beautiful intricacy, and of such astonishing design techniques that it took the civilized English world a full 1,400 years to approach the same level of craftsmanship.

The device now bears the monicker of where it lay, undiscovered, for all of those centuries.  It is the Antikythera Mechanism.  The computer of the ancients. 

Universal Design for Learning

I have now received some more information that relates to my forthcoming ADE orientation session in March - released via iTunes U from the ADE Institute.  The nice thing about iTunes U is that it connects pretty seamlessly to iBooks and of course to standard websites.  So a couple of interesting looking iBooks have come my way, and also a website which I had never heard of, for the National Center (sic) on Universal Design for Learning.
The purpose of UDL is to design learner-centred materials that encompass Recognition Networks (the 'what' of learning), Strategic Networks (the 'how' of learning) and Affective Networks (the 'why' of learning).  Coupled with this are multiple means of representation (aligned to Recognition Networks), Action and Expression (Strategic Networks) and Engagement (Affective Networks).  This does sound like yet more edu-speak at first glance, but what I like is that the website links to a variety of research papers that explore the reasoning behind this methodology. Apple's take on this is to produce a variety of learner-centred materials that align with these three principles, and of course you can imagine how iBooks, iTunes U and a host of creative apps could plug into this.  So interesting times lay ahead for me in terms of materials that I will be producing.

Inquiry-based learning

I followed a link via twitter the other day about enquiry-based learning. It got me thinking about how I approach this with my own classes.  The link quotes Chris Lehmann as he reflects on the successes of challenges with this approach in his Science Leadership Academy.  Lehman identifies 3 key steps to success:

(1) Defining the meaning of enquiry-basd learning
(2) The changes that signal a shift towards that approach
(3) Potential drawbacks
(1) Lehmann takes an interesting look at the notion of personalized of project based or even collaborative learning sessions - and asks whether they actually lead the students into a truly inquiry-based state of learning?  He talks about adaptive software that might lead students through topics at the own pace set by their own abilities - but that this software fails to ask students real-world questions about that material, or to contextualise is, or to communicate these concepts with others.  Similarly he criticises collaborative projects that are bound by strict guidelines, in which the end-products are more or less the same across different student groups.  Lehman is at pains to note that an inquiry-based approach pays little heed to HOW the learning happens, and is more concerned with encouraging students to learn even more - even if they and the teacher themselves don't know the answer.

This is the key - that often there is a blank page in which the teacher and the students do not know what will happen next.   There also should be some sort of ability to publish content, through e-portfolios, blogs, twitter, good old-fashioned printed or handwritten reports, video - anything that suits the content.
Potential obstacles to an enquiry-based learning approach are that lesson are necessarily a lot harder to plan, that covering key content is sometimes harder to plot, and that assessing student progress is not a simple case of ticking boxes or marking homework.  The very essence of assessment is called into question here - what is it that we are looking for when we assess students?  What should we be looking for?

Culture of learning

I read a nice post here which neatly summarises the current thinking of many educationalists about learning.  The interesting thing is that it is written by a Grade A student who is himself questioning the meaning and purpose behind his own education - an education which netted him outstanding grades and led to a whole host of scholarships and awards, but which felt to him as if he had lost his inner voice and his creativity.   I have written about such ideas before but as the article states, this approach to schooling teaches the students that schooling is simply a tenure where you sacrifice creative learning for  educational results.  That is on a good day, with good students.  On a bad day it is simply a turn off for students who are labelled incompetent and not up to the job of organizing themselves to revise and regurgitating facts for an exam board.
I have worked in a variety of schools, some outstanding with amazing results and students.  Some courses I have taught achieved 100% A*-C, and many 95% or more.  But I did not enable this to happen simply by spitting facts at the students to swallow.  Six years ago my students were utilizing learning walls, where they come and pick their own challenging sub-task of their choice once they have finished their main lessons task.  The sub-tasks are graded from 1 star (easy) to 3 stars (difficult), and all of the classes were mixed ability. And the incredible thing?  I found that even the weaker students - who might otherwise be switched off in a standard lesson - were desperate to tackle sub-tasks that were harder than 1 star level.  They really wanted to achieve, and with a little guidance many of them did.
Six years ago we were not using wonderfully collaborative technology such as google docs or iPads.  Six years ago my classes were the only ones using challenge walls in the class.  Now I am part of a school where creativity and resilience and independence of enquiry are celebrated and formally recognised, and as a member of SLT we are starting to see the reaping of the benefits.

I have just read a fascinating article from Wired about the new beta release of Facebook search, entitle Graph Search.  Being from Wired, the article goes into a fair bit of depth about how if differs from the likes of google, and at first glance it sounds like it will have google quaking in their boots.  I remember the days of lycos, of alltheweb and altavista.  Altavista in particular used to knock google for six, and was the only search engine I ever used consistently.

Even back then I found yahoo just too...overwhelming, and google eventually started to overtake the likes of altavista in my mind because of the simplicity of its interface, and because of their PageRank algorithms, which marked data according to its visibility and popularity.  Of course now that google have monetised the whole notion of searching - so that prominent listing positions are based upon how much the advertiser wishes to pay for that heady position - you would think that would have put me off.  But no, like most of the planet it is still my trusted search engine.  In a way it has passed from a search tool into a cultural norm, into a verb in a dictionary.  To google.

So the article about Graph Search piques my interest because Facebook itself - 1 billion users and counting - has already hit that saturation point where it has become a cultural norm (if you are in the Westernised, English speaking world that is) To harvest so many users and so much data and to create a search tool with at least the same level of sophistication - and probably more - as google.  And THEN to wrap this all up so that Facebook users themselves are inadvertently providing the data - well what this does is shift the responsibility for a good link from a very clever search algorithm that simply mines passive websites, to an equally clever search algorithm that is showing what other people think and feel about data.  So searching for all the Italian restaurants that my friends in KL like is a realistic thing to do on Facebook.  And so much more powerful than what I can do with google.

Apple of course would like a bite of this, er, apple, and Siri also interests me in the sense that it takes away the pain of typing and makes searching a much more natural experience.  Well it will when it evolves over the next couple of years - and Facebook will at some point integrate voice recognition into Graph Search.  Apple of course have expertise in mobile phones and apps; Facebook have so far proved slow and unusually reticent on smartphones.  Google owns desktop and Android searches.  Three giants of technology all doing the same thing in different ways.  All owning a great chunk of the data market.

Back in the day this is what they used to call competition, and the beauty of competition is that the user ultimately benefits.

Apple Distinguished Educator? Moi?

Yesterday was not a good day for me.  Trying to run Windows 7 through VirtualBox on the newly installed iMacs in our classrooms.  This was for a Year 11 mock exam - in Year 10 the students have been using Windows 7 PCs, so with the influx of the new iMacs into our classroom, I took the decision that I would rather they stay in Windows over the next two terms than have to re-learn everything in a Mac OS environment.  Anyway the printers - which have been extensively tested mind - just decided yesterday to drop the ball and not print the files.  Nothing worked.  In the middle of an exam.  Eventually we figured out that it was something to do with Windows on a Mac PLUS something to do with this:

1. A 500kb image file needed to be inserted into a 24kb rtf text file
2. This text file is then manipulated in various ways
3. Then the students print the file.

Ach no they don't print the file because if they save the document as rtf or just print straight away without saving, it generates files that are 40, 50 or 60MB in size.  HOW on earth can this be the case?  Welcome to file formats.

Now of course we did not figure this out until the students had all panicked, been instructed by me to ignore printing, and copied their work electronically onto their desktops instead.  Still not a good day.

So imagine my delight when I found out in the evening that I had been accepted as an ADE for the class of 2013!  This is almost as if the yan of the iMac/Windows nonsense of earlier was counterbalanced by the ying of receiving such good news.

So there you have it, after much blood, sweat and tears and wiping out the entire month of November, I have been accepted into the global apple community of educators.  

Things that my old brain finds amazing - pt. 1

Internet radio

On the occasions that I venture back mentally to my days of listening to the radio in the 80s, I am struck by something.  I remember very clearly receiving a digital clock radio as a birthday resent in the early 80s, and thinking it was the most amazing invention because at the slightest rotation of an analogue dial I was able to hop to any number of other stations that were broadcasting at the time.  This included mainly Manchester stations, but also the odd foreign language channel, which was tres exotic, and if I was really lucky, a police channel.  Nothing beat the buzz of tuning in to a live police broadcast of a 1985 Ford Cortina being chased down the M62 on a wet February evening.  

I graduated from this to a full on Alba midi system in 1986 - and again the thrill of having a comprehensive sound system - with the girth and the go-faster flashes and the whirring of the cassette heads...well it is something that is difficult to reproduce now that we are all firmly ensconced in the digital world.

However now that I am fully immersed in Apple tech, I downloaded the Tune-In Radio app - and what do you know, I found myself once again experiencing the thrill of having an enormous panoply of radio stations from which to choose. Of course now the choice is global and is digital, but it still raised the hairs on the back of my neck to listen to a Swedish Jazz station playing John Coltrane at 3pm KL time.  Of course digital internet radio stations are not exactly cutting edge - but the point is that this free little app brought me back to a halcyon time in my youth when the world was full of possibilities and all kinds of strange music.  And as a human being in my 40s, it was nice to be transported back to that time.

Grabs you and locks you in

Now do bear in mind that I come to Apple technology from the point of view of the Spectrum/Atari ST/Archimedes/WinTel models.  In other words my experience with computers has been very diverse and the closest thing to a single platform is that I have tended to teach on Windows machines for most of my teaching career - and therefore use them for personal computing.  A couple of years ago, having gone through hell and high-water to even attempt to get a ticket for a queue to buy an iPhone 4 in KL, I  turned on my heels and went to the nearest Maxis shop and bought an HTC Wildfire instead.  And I felt good about it because open source Android OS things are generally good in principle, and I felt like I was cocking a snoop to the Apple behemoth.  

Fast forward now, and having used iPads and subsequently a macbook and iMacs in teaching, I must say that I have gone over to the other side.  Apple devices just WORK better, FEEL better, ARE better than their PC or Android equivalent.  And much of this has to do with the ecosystem that envelopes you whenever you use an Apple device - an ecosystem that supports you and does crazy things like use iCloud across all devices, bouncing photos around photostream.  Not crazy now but the idea was two years ago.  It just works better.  Hence we now have a Macbook, an iPad 2 and 3 from work, an iPhone 4S for my Christmas present, which is so much better in so many ways than my Wildfire that I do not have the time to express how, and that gleaming white tease of an iPad mini for K.  The reason why the ecosystem is important in all of this is that it took me - Director of ICT - two full, intense, concentrated hours in the wee small hours to get my contacts off my old Android phone and onto my iPhone, involving convert address books into csv, then into vcf, then into iTunes, then up into the (google) cloud, then down onto the iPhone.  Eventually.  The process was like moving house and at one point I was seriously going to give up and manually enter them all, which of course is anathema to anybody who is in any way IT-savvy, but was an attractive proposition with three small children snapping at my heels.  So eventually I got it to work and I now realise that I never want to move house/ecosystems again.  I want to stay enveloped and secure.  As an aside, the iPad mini is just the most desirable piece of kit I think I have ever used - works absolutely perfectly, as light as the gossamer wing-tip of a silicon angel, and brings a smile to your face whenever you use it.  Apple are doing something right, aren't they?

Ownership in the cloud

An interesting read in the Guardian yesterday, concerning who exactly owns the content that users upload into cloud services such as Instagram.  This is a thorny old issue but is prompted by the changes to the Terms and Conditions of the use of Instagram, which kick in on January 13th.   From then on, the use of Instagram is conditional upon you being required to share your username, likeness and photos - and for them to be used for advertising purposes without you receiving any form of reimbursement.  This would certainly impact upon professional and semi-professional photographers, who might otherwise make some decent money from selling their photos online - if they now upload these photographs into Instagram then they could lose all rights to these.  To which one could counter - well, don't do it then.  Keep your own personal or commercial photographs - or any kind of data - away from such cloud services.  But that does not really address the issue, since a great many people are using cloud computing services and entrusting these services with potentially sensitive data.  My school has - in no small part because of me - committed to using google apps for all staff and students.  This includes gmail and google docs, plus google calendar.  There are now many hundreds of thousands of documents that we have entrusted to google to backup, restore and generally look after for us.  In google's case, they do not own the data that I have put into their services, but they do reserve the right to do whatever they like with it.  The lesson there being - if you want to use a free cloud service, be sure to know what you are signing up for.

Just who is the teacher here?

Reading all about third millennium learners and how they are that much more collaborative and social and independent in their approach to educational materials, visiting the likes of iTunes U and the Kahn Academy and taking learning into their own hands….and yes I teach in a school where I can imagine that happens a great deal.  But it was brought home to me on the evening of my ADE application when I was trying to overlay a soundtrack that I had made in Garageband into iMovie.  It is a bit of a bind if you are not familiar with sharing things via iTunes (as opposed to Save As on a Windows machine using something like Audacity).  Anyway I was searching for answers on youtube as one does, and I came across this video:

Now this exactly met my needs and it explained what I had to do perfectly.  And it was delivered by a schoolboy who is known as techkidhelp101 who could not surely have been any older than Year 9, and in fact may well be younger.  So here I am as Director of ICT in a major International School, with 13 years of teaching experience under my belt, being taught by an anonymous school child from somewheresville how to do something fairly technical.  AND notice that he has an entire channel that he posts instructional videos into.  Is he charging for this?  No.  Does he get some long term hidden benefit out of this?  Probably not.  Is he trying to monetize this as a service?  I doubt it.  He is simply sharing his knowledge across the web because he thinks it is a cool thing to do, spreading the word, and utterly empowering himself as a provider of knowledge - which is exactly what teachers used to do back when I started.  
Isn't that amazing really if you think about it?  What a modern world we are in, what a flipped world.  I know that there are plenty of children who are nowhere near anything like this level of communication and technical skill, and I don't want to make assumptions that everybody is doing this all the time.  But when I find people who do, then they become nuggets of gold in my teacher brain and it does make me think that the modern world is an amazing place, and that we as a profession need to adapt to it pretty quickly.

Pre-ADE jitters

So here I am on a Sunday afternoon, having just made Christmas paper chains with the kids and watching a battering tropical storm assault our balcony for the second time today - which even for KL, is a little unusual.

My head is swimming with items to complete for my ADE application, including tidying up a few links to my iTunes U courses, looking through transparency text boxes in wordpress for an idea I have for a parental portal for GIS, and, erm, shooting the actual video for the ADE application.  I have at least storyboarded it but when I read other ADE applicants who had posted online at just how much time it takes up, I did wonder whether it was them being a bit like a Fresher student, or whether or not it really did eat into you soul.  And my soul has been gorged upon like an, er,  half-bitten apple.  Or something.
The ultimate purpose of applying for ADE status has been self-improvement, and I know a huge amount more about iTunes U Course Manager, iMovie themes and transitions, iBooks author and Garageband as a result of going for this.  So I guess even if I fail to make the (gr)ADE then at least I can be satisfied that I have learned plenty of techie things that otherwise would have been placed in the file marked 'non essential so put them off awhile'.
Failing that I could try instead to create a Christmas decorations app and spread the decoration love over the festive season...nope too late...

A bygone era

In the midst of completing my iTunes U course about 3rd millennium technology I came across the following book that was buried in a dusty old box from our previous office.  I kept it for posterity because, well sometimes that's what you do with books.  Do people keep apps or iBooks for posterity? For purely sentimental reason because the smell and the feel and the patina of the artifact evokes something within you that takes you back to a bygone era?  This is the reason why I rescued this book from pulverization and I share a couple of pictures below:

It took an act of enormous self-discipline to stop myself from uploading another 20 pictures from this book, and equally to resist spending an hour looking up hardware from the era such as the Sinclair ZX-81 - referred to in the book if you look carefully as the Timex Sinclair 1000.
Sigh.

Earcos 2012 thoughts - education is evolving

Nice tube map here - inspired by Greg Whitby at Earcos - showing trending technology, all the way back in 2007.  I searched for it and think it may be this one but I also really like this one related to 2012.

Mobiles and time management

My beloved Diga

I have been using a very basic mobile phone for the last couple of weeks - the snazzily entitled Samsung GTE1080i (why an i?) due to an unfortunate incident involving my HTC Wildfire and a jacuzzi (well when in condos…)

It has taken me two weeks to get to the point that I can text at a decent speed because it has no predictive text and of course no onscreen keyboard.  This got me thinking to back in the day when I had my first phone and how far technology has come since this halcyon days.  That model was a Philips Diga on the BT CellNet network. back in 1997..

DynaTac.  Wow.

and whilst it was not quite on the size level as the Motorola DynaTac then it certainly was a large beast.  It was the first era of pay as you go mobile phones, and my wife and I bought one for each other for our birthdays.  I cannot describe the sheer excitement in 1997 of owning a mobile phone that enabled any person in the street to telephone any other person  - not at home, not through having to queue at a telephone box - but to contact another person who was also in the street or on the bus and generally out and about.  It is no over exaggeration to state that it utterly revolutionised communication, and with it the expectations that people had in terms of meeting up and organizing themselves.  Technology suddenly allowed people to be slightly less planned when arranging a meeting - all of a sudden if you were running late, you were able to telephone the other person to alert them to this.  Prior to this you either were on time to an engagement, or you were not.  The other person either waited for you, or they did not.  No communication mid transit.  

Samsung GTE1080i

Of course the other aspect to the early analogue mobile phones were the SMS capabilities of that era.  These are the self same capabilities that I using right now on my Samsung - terribly exciting in 1997 but needing a certain discipline.  As I am rediscovering, it takes a certain amount of time and concentration to compose even a simple text message, and this has made me think a little more before sending them.  I cannot tweet or Facebook on this phone, and that is at least two less distractions removed from me immediately.  This phone does not even feature Tetris or Snake - unlike my BT Cellnet which had the stunning Snake II - so there are very few distractions.  It does what it is supposed to.  The other day somebody texted me and my phone told me that I had too many messages saved in its memory, which is something that I have not heard for a long time - the maximum number it can handle is 50

This got me thinking of an old article I remember reading in the 00s about time saving tips with technology - so that if you need to delete your text messages you should do so whilst waiting for a bus or in the toilet or in some other situation in which you have unavoidable idle minutes.  But now whilst waiting for a bus people are tweeting or playing Angry Birds Star Wars.

Smartphones of today do everything that PCs of ten years ago did - it is an incredible amount of power in one incredibly small device, and there are numerous benefits to this.  But there are also numerous distractions and I do wonder if, in the days of on screen keyboards and now of course even Siri/Iris style voice recognition - are we lacking the discipline that defined our 1990s use of mobiles?  This also makes me think that technology is both enabling and constraining us - I do not need to be as composed and disciplined in my SMS or Whatsapp or BBM messages any more because I can let fly with another one an instant later.

Razr V3...sigh...

Am I saying that this is a good thing or a bad thing? I think it is simply an evolution of how we are communicating, and of how we manage our time, and of how our device manage our time for us, and take the legwork out of it in many cases.  I think that might be a good thing, but I am not fully convinced yet.

As an aside, my favourite ever mobile phone was this lovely Motorola Razr that cost me $1000 in Singapore in 2004 - hued from sheer metal rolled on the thighs of the gods and crushed to smithereens by the elephantine stomping of my baby son three years later :(  It warms me to note that Motorola still make the Razr, for all its faults, and I can see why people nowadays have similar aesthetic feelings about their iPhones.

It's a connected world

A couple of recent online postings caught my interest this week. Firstly I joined a twitter group for The Headteachers Roundtable, the purpose of which is to help create education policy which is centered upon what is best for the learning of all children.  And who wouldn't want that?

The second occurred a couple of days ago where I followed a Guardian link to a ICT curriculum proposal from Bill Mitchell of the BCS.

The google doc is here, open until 19th November, and by the way it is open to students too.

Quite matter of factly I have been leaving my 2 pennorth worth via tweets, and in the comments section of the google doc, and I am still old enough to be struck by just how amazing it is that I am able to have a say in such groups.  It made me feel that I am part of the democratisation of the internet.  Now making me feel that way, and me actually being that way are two different things.  But when I think of being a schoolboy in Rochdale who was studying Computer Science in 1986, programming the code that would create the space station in Elite via logo (yes really)…I would have been stunned to think that I could have even the tiniest say in shaping a draft educational policy that would then be presented in a matter of days to the DfE.

So here we are, in the Third Millennium of knowledge democratisation and able to make that smallest element of difference.  Who would have thought it?

earcos expanded

So here I am once more trying to pull together some coherence to what I picked up at earcos.

Somewhat delayed by a variety of projects, including the potentially huge logistical headache of gmail migration across the entire school, continuing with the e-portfolios that we have launched via google sites, buying and rolling out a robust wifi solution for the school, same with iPads, oh and also trying to get my head around applying for the Asia ADE that has just sprung forth from apple.

In fact it is not so much the number of projects, but the sheer volume of information that I have come across in the last few weeks or so.  I have now re-visited this blog for example after a year out, but I have also gone back to my twitter account @Steve-T_Online and I am liking it a whole lot more than Facebook.  Something about 140 characters that condenses the mind.  I am also being pulled aside by iTunes U - in the midst of developing a course about Systems Life Cycle (yes I know) for my Year 11 students, but I am also distracted by several courses about Philosophy and induction/causality - of which my favourite is this one.   Peter Millican is everything that my best Philosophy lecturers were back in the day 20 years ago - a gentle, musing style masking a vast brain.

I also had some time to reflect with SLT colleagues at earcos and I am also conscious that, more than at any time I have encountered in the last 20 years, we are standing at a crossroads in terms of education, and what on earth happens to it in the future.  So let's go...